Sunday, November 26, 2006

Extreme Makeover Continues @ ODN

We read today that the Oshkosh Northwestern wants to dump its national columnists for local ones.

Is this a good thing? A couple of years ago the editors there would have said it was a terrible idea, an abdication of professional standards, a surefire way of polluting political discourse.

But things change, not least the economics of newspapering. A couple of weeks ago Gannett, the parent company of the Northwestern, reported a 2 percent decline in newspaper advertising revenues for the month of October. Classified revenues (the traditional cash cow) at community papers were down even more.

So the Northwestern stands to save a few bucks by switching away from syndicated writers to local ones, who presumably will agree to be paid with a byline and a head shot in the paper.

But I think there is more to the paper's motivation than purely a monetary one, since this move really won't be much of a savings given what syndicated columnists are paid per publication.

I think the paper's editors have come to the conclusion that their future is in citizen journalism, and only partly because of the economic imperatives. According to Alex Hummel:

As the newspaper evolves and becomes a higher-tech Swiss army knife of information, one low-tech thing becomes clearer and clearer.

The Oshkosh Northwestern is ultimately your paper.

Folks running the show just make sure everyone gets a fair say, inside and online.

Is this a good thing?

Well, I think it's a step in the right direction. But where that step will lead is anyone's guess. (A question I have for Alex is what will the paper do if/when its community contributors start actively [OK, more actively] campaigning for office? Are the forums for "community conversation" or electioneering? Should the paper care?)

In the long run, I think local papers like the Northwestern are going to end up being like credit unions, owned by their customers, who have a say in determining costs, revenues and strategic direction.

But as much as I like credit unions, few of them provide as robust a range of products and services as a full-service bank. We need more.

The newspaper has a special role to play beyond encouraging discussion. It needs to be a watchdog and a critic (and sometimes a cheerleader). This distinctive public service role is what gives it its privileged standing in the community.

At the moment, there is a fair amount of local news that is getting broken in other media outlets (mostly the blogosphere but also shows like Eye on Oshkosh) . Someone who wants to be fully informed about what is going on in Oshkosh cannot rely solely on the local paper.

A lot of the changes at the Northwestern are for the better, but I think a price is being paid in terms of a reduction in bread-and-butter news coverage.

To make its transformation to citizen journalism work, the Northwestern needs to find the right balance between the citizen part and the journalism part.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

So far, what they have been running on the editorial page is, to be polite, garbage. The snippets from the discussions on the message boards are trivial and annoying.

Why do I care what a bunch of semi-informed gripers think about local politics?

10:35 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home